The critics gave poor ratings to ‘Hippi‘. So, the movie will be categorized as a classic one as director TN Krishna’s movie ‘Nuvvu Nenu Prema’ was slammed by the critics but later was said to be a classic, according to him.
What kind of s logic is this stating that every poorly rated movie must and should be considered a classic? Why impose a flop movie as a classic as if there is something else beyond the understanding of the common audiences and reviewers?
Once in a while, a film that garnered mixed talk from the critics and reviewers might turn out into a blockbuster in terms of the box-office collections but rarely a classic.
But, whenever their newly released films get poor ratings from the critics, the filmmakers are declaring their movies as classics. Recently, Teja wanted poor ratings for ‘Sita’ saying that his movie would be a blockbuster if given poor ratings. It bit dust.
Director Selvaraghavan and Suriya were of the same opinion that their movie can be decoded only by masterminds and thus, was said to be a disaster. Now, it’s TN Krishna’s turn. What is this logic, boss?
